in exhibitions of painting has become a trendy new method of exposure: the environment is immersed in darkness that is torn apart by powerful spot directly focused on the works. In this way, the paintings stand out with almost phosphorescent brilliance that, although impressive at first glance, it has been very controversial. First we must say that this excessive focus light is harmful to the expression of color, painting, distort and glazed, and this of course prevents the use of his "interior resonance".
Several of the works that I have seen exposed in this way harmful, I had previously enjoyed in other exhibitions, and so I found the obvious adulteration of images: the colors are cream, flatly approved and tonally forced, and there is a severe depletion of depth. Also sanctioned is a drastic gap between the observer and the work in the sense that the artificiality of the expository method to undo all the audience potential of natural and intimate reflection, he is bewildered by having to move forcefully into the darkness from which emerge the pictures: there is proximity, the work is made absolute sense and away like a object of veneration.
Several of the works that I have seen exposed in this way harmful, I had previously enjoyed in other exhibitions, and so I found the obvious adulteration of images: the colors are cream, flatly approved and tonally forced, and there is a severe depletion of depth. Also sanctioned is a drastic gap between the observer and the work in the sense that the artificiality of the expository method to undo all the audience potential of natural and intimate reflection, he is bewildered by having to move forcefully into the darkness from which emerge the pictures: there is proximity, the work is made absolute sense and away like a object of veneration.
But this is the method of presenting the status symbol, not the act for the Arts! As shown in the advertisement, the image of any status symbols dictated by the market - be it a car, a watch, a dress designer or a perfume - must necessarily be sophisticated, glowing, put on the highest pedestal as an idol for the masses because does not have an existential reality to share, but it is essentially an illusion that must be passed off with spells likely to stir up the desire. Such an object must be performed, making it far, is because the mind desires above what seems unattainable, or otherwise reveal your actual littleness.
work of art has a strong and healthy instead of content ' soul: this is his wealth, which we appreciate and share by establishing an empathy with what the artist was able to evoke empathy and requires truth, naturalness and confidence. The best conditions for displaying art are certainly those that show of course the work, and putting the viewer at home, encouraging beneficial relaxation that leads to the opening and expansion perceptive soul. It should also be considered particularly appreciates that the soul that is not brutally defined, but is pervaded by the mystery, which is why true artists have always preferred what is suffused the soul because it is multidimensional and creative suggestions. And the light, often as important as spiritual revelation in Art, has leaked from within the work, not slapped the outside.
Nell'esasperata Bright Art could also recognize antagonism Manichean of light and shadow that belongs to both alla povertà della nostra Cultura, sia religiosamente che politicamente. Credo che ormai sia evidente come tale assolutismo dualistico sia segno d'ipocrisia e d'incapacità di comprensione; infatti non abbiamo bisogno di un'Arte mitizzata, sofisticata e forzosamente classificata, bensì di un'Arte veritiera, fondata sulla genuina esperienza esistenziale che l'essere umano può fare di se stesso, delle proprie emozioni, e del Tutto.
0 comments:
Post a Comment